South Okanagan Residents’ Confusion Delays Board Decision on Short-Term Rental Changes

Elegant neutral-toned bedroom with plush bedding, perfect for vacation rentals or Airbnb listings.

The Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen (RDOS) board has postponed a crucial decision regarding proposed changes to short-term rental (STR) regulations. This delay stems from significant confusion expressed by residents during a recent public hearing, highlighting a need for clearer communication and further deliberation on the complex issue. The proposed amendments aim to align local bylaws with new provincial legislation, which has introduced stricter rules for STRs across British Columbia, with a particular focus on the principal residence requirement and the implementation of licensing fees.

The Evolving Regulatory Landscape of Short-Term Rentals in British Columbia

Introduction to the Provincial Shift

In recent years, the proliferation of short-term rentals has become a significant topic of discussion for municipalities and regional districts across British Columbia. Concerns over housing affordability, the availability of long-term rental stock, and the impact on community character have prompted provincial intervention. The provincial government has enacted new legislation designed to provide a more consistent and comprehensive regulatory framework for STRs, aiming to rebalance the housing market and ensure a more equitable distribution of housing resources. This provincial initiative has necessitated that local governments, including the RDOS, review and update their own bylaws to comply with these new standards.

Background of Proposed RDOS Changes

The RDOS board has been actively considering amendments to its Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaws and Zoning Amendment Bylaws concerning short-term rentals. These proposed changes, initially brought forward in January 2025, are a direct response to the provincial government’s legislative overhaul of the STR sector. The primary driver behind these local amendments is to ensure that STR operations within the RDOS adhere to the provincial government’s principal residence requirement. This requirement is a cornerstone of the new provincial framework, intended to curb the conversion of long-term housing into commercial accommodations and thereby increase the availability of homes for residents.

Provincial Mandate and Local Adaptation

The province of British Columbia has taken a decisive stance on regulating short-term rentals, introducing significant legislative changes that came into effect on May 1, 2024. A key alteration is the revised definition of a short-term rental, now encompassing any rental agreement for a duration of less than 90 consecutive days. Previously, this threshold was set at 30 days. Furthermore, the provincial legislation mandates that a property’s principal use must be as a residence. Short-term rentals are permissible only for a portion of the year, and only if specific criteria are met, including the property being the operator’s principal residence. Many local governments, including those within the Okanagan region, found that their existing bylaws did not meet the exemption criteria related to vacancy rates, thus requiring them to align with the new provincial standards. This has led to a wave of bylaw reviews and amendments across the province.

The RDOS Public Hearing and Resident Concerns

The Public Hearing Process

A critical juncture in the RDOS’s regulatory process was a recent public hearing, scheduled to gather direct feedback from residents on the proposed changes to STR bylaws. This hearing was intended to provide a platform for property owners, operators, and concerned citizens to voice their opinions and concerns regarding the new regulations. The RDOS board was expected to consider this feedback before making a final decision on the proposed amendments. However, the proceedings revealed a significant level of confusion among attendees, leading to an unexpected outcome.

Nature of Resident Confusion

The primary reason cited for the delay in the board’s decision was the widespread confusion among residents regarding the specifics of the proposed regulations. Many attendees expressed uncertainty about how the new rules would directly impact their properties and businesses. Questions arose concerning the number of rooms that could be legally rented out, the precise application of the principal residence requirement in different scenarios, and the variations in regulations across different electoral areas and municipalities within the RDOS. This confusion indicated a potential gap in the information provided to the public or a lack of clarity in the presentation of the proposed bylaws.

RDOS Response to Confusion

In light of the expressed confusion, RDOS chair Mark Pendergraft acknowledged the complexity of the regulations and the varying ways in which they might be applied across different areas. He noted that the application of these rules has been influenced by past board decisions and that public hearings are primarily forums for expressing opinions rather than detailed question-and-answer sessions. To address the information deficit, Pendergraft requested that RDOS staff prepare and release additional information to further clarify the proposed changes. The RDOS communications team has confirmed that efforts are underway to develop this supplementary material to aid public understanding.

Reconvening the Public Hearing

As a result of the confusion and the need for further clarification, the public hearing was recessed. It is scheduled to be reconvened at the next RDOS board meeting, slated for September 18, 2025. This continuation provides an opportunity for further discussion and allows residents to have their questions addressed once more detailed and accessible information is made available. The official RDOS agenda, which is publicly accessible online, contains comprehensive details regarding the proposed changes for each specific area under the RDOS’s jurisdiction.

Key Proposed Regulatory Elements for Short-Term Rentals

The Principal Residence Requirement

A central tenet of the proposed RDOS regulations, mirroring provincial legislation, is the reinforcement of the principal residence requirement. This rule stipulates that for a property to be legally operated as a short-term rental, it must primarily function as the owner’s principal home. The underlying objective of this requirement is to prioritize the availability of housing for long-term residents. By limiting the extent to which entire homes can be converted into commercial short-term accommodations, the RDOS aims to contribute to the local housing supply and mitigate potential impacts on rental markets. This measure is particularly relevant in areas experiencing housing pressures.

Licensing and Fees

Under the proposed bylaws, a significant number of short-term rental operators will be required to obtain a local business license. This licensing requirement is intended to bring the STR sector into a more formalized and regulated framework, enabling better oversight, compliance, and data collection. The proposed annual fee for this business license is set at $500. This fee structure is part of a broader strategy to manage the impacts of short-term rentals on communities and to generate revenue that could potentially be reinvested in local services or housing initiatives. The implementation of licensing fees is a common practice in many municipalities seeking to regulate STRs.

Property-Specific Restrictions

The proposed RDOS bylaws also include provisions that impose limits on the number of dwelling units that can be utilized for short-term rental accommodation within a specific property. These restrictions may vary depending on factors such as the size of the property and its zoning designation. This nuanced approach acknowledges that not all properties are suitable for the same level of STR activity and allows for regulations to be tailored to the physical characteristics and context of individual properties. Such restrictions aim to prevent the over-concentration of STRs in certain areas and to maintain the residential character of neighborhoods.

Health, Safety, and Parking Requirements

To ensure the safety and well-being of both short-term rental guests and the wider community, the proposed regulations stipulate that operators in certain RDOS areas must meet specific health and safety standards. These requirements may include ensuring adequate off-street vehicle parking is available for guests, conducting a thorough health and safety inspection of the property, and developing a comprehensive fire evacuation plan. Adherence to these standards is crucial for minimizing potential risks, ensuring compliance with building codes, and maintaining a safe environment for all involved. These measures are consistent with best practices in STR regulation aimed at protecting public safety.

Specific Electoral Area and Municipal Considerations

Opt-In Provisions for Rural Areas

Provincial legislation offers flexibility for rural areas that do not meet a specific population threshold, defined as 10,000 persons, to choose whether or not to opt into the new STR regulations. Within the RDOS, three electoral areas have proactively decided to opt into this provincial framework. This opt-in mechanism allows smaller or more rural communities to tailor the application of STR regulations to their unique local contexts, needs, and economic drivers. It recognizes that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be appropriate for the diverse geographical and demographic makeup of the RDOS.

Osoyoos’s Early Adoption of Provincial Rules

The Town of Osoyoos was among the first municipalities in the region to align its local bylaws with the provincial primary residence requirements for short-term rentals. This significant move occurred in March 2024, predating the broader provincial implementation date. Osoyoos’s proactive approach demonstrates a commitment to addressing STR issues and adapting to the evolving regulatory landscape. This early adoption by a key municipality in the region may have influenced or set a precedent for other local governments within the RDOS and surrounding areas as they navigate similar regulatory changes.

Naramata Resident Concerns and Perspectives

During the public hearing, a resident from the Naramata area voiced significant concerns, suggesting that the proposed changes could have unintended negative consequences for rural communities. This resident argued that the provincial regulations, which were largely designed to address rental costs and housing shortages in larger urban centers, might not be suitable for very rural areas. There is a fear that these regulations could potentially harm the local tourism industry and related businesses, which are often vital to the economic well-being of rural areas, rather than achieving the intended benefits for renters. This perspective highlights the differing impacts the regulations may have across diverse communities within the RDOS, emphasizing the need for localized considerations.

The Regulatory Timeline and Next Steps for the RDOS

Public Information and Engagement Efforts

Prior to the board meeting where the decision was to be made, the RDOS undertook efforts to inform the public about the proposed STR changes. On June 11, 2025, an information meeting was held, attracting approximately 39 members of the public. This indicates a level of community interest and engagement with the issue. However, the subsequent confusion observed during the public hearing suggests that while engagement efforts were made, further clarification and more accessible communication strategies may be necessary to ensure full public understanding of the complex regulatory proposals.

Board Readings and Deliberations

The RDOS board has been following a structured legislative process for the proposed STR bylaw amendments. The bylaws in question received their first and second readings in August 2025. The meeting held on Thursday was specifically scheduled to include a public hearing, a crucial step for gathering community feedback before the board proceeds. Following the public hearing, the board was to deliberate on the feedback received and decide whether to advance the Zoning Bylaw Amendment and STR Accommodation Review to a third reading. This staged approach allows for thorough consideration and incorporates public input at multiple points in the decision-making process.

Provincial Approval Requirement

It is a critical point to understand that even if the RDOS board approves the proposed changes through all necessary readings and formally adopts the bylaws, these amendments will still require final approval from the provincial government. This requirement underscores the overarching authority of provincial legislation in the regulation of short-term rentals. Local bylaws must be consistent with provincial standards, and any deviations or non-compliance could lead to the amendments being disallowed. This ensures a degree of uniformity and adherence to provincial objectives across British Columbia.

Addressing Resident Confusion and Moving Forward

The Nature of the Confusion

The core issue that led to the delay was the palpable confusion among residents regarding the practical implications of the proposed STR regulations. Operators and property owners expressed specific uncertainties about how the new rules would affect their ability to operate, including questions about the permissible number of rental units, the precise definition and application of the principal residence rule in their unique circumstances, and the extent to which regulations might differ across various electoral areas. This highlights a need for more detailed, accessible, and area-specific information to be disseminated to the public to ensure a clear understanding of the regulatory framework.

RDOS Response to Confusion

RDOS chair Mark Pendergraft addressed the confusion by acknowledging that the application of STR rules can indeed vary by area and has been shaped by previous board decisions. He also clarified that public hearings are primarily intended for the expression of opinions rather than for in-depth question-and-answer sessions. In response to the information gap, Pendergraft formally requested that RDOS staff develop and release further information to help clarify the proposed changes for the public. The RDOS communications team has confirmed that this work is in progress, indicating a commitment to improving transparency and understanding.

Reconvening the Public Hearing for Further Discussion

The public hearing was officially recessed and will be reconvened at the next RDOS board meeting, scheduled for September 18, 2025. This continuation is a crucial step, providing a dedicated opportunity for further discussion and allowing residents to have their questions addressed more comprehensively, particularly once the additional clarifying information from RDOS staff becomes available. The RDOS agenda, which is published online, will contain the full details of the proposed changes for each area, serving as a key resource for residents seeking to understand the specifics relevant to their properties and communities.

Broader Implications and Future Outlook for Short-Term Rentals

Impact on Tourism and Local Economy

The ongoing debate surrounding short-term rental regulations in the South Okanagan touches upon a critical balance between managing housing availability and supporting the region’s significant tourism sector. Proponents of stricter regulations emphasize the need to increase the supply of long-term rental housing to address affordability issues. Conversely, some STR operators and residents express concerns that overly restrictive rules could negatively impact tourism businesses, which are often a vital economic engine for the region, particularly in its more rural areas. The ultimate success of the new regulations will hinge on their ability to strike an effective balance between these competing interests and to foster sustainable economic development without exacerbating housing challenges.

The Role of STRs in Housing Markets

The provincial government’s intervention in the short-term rental market is largely motivated by widespread concerns about housing affordability and availability across British Columbia. The legislative changes are designed, in part, to encourage properties currently used for short-term rentals to transition back into the long-term rental market. This policy aims to alleviate pressure on housing supply and make more homes accessible to residents seeking long-term accommodation. The effectiveness of these measures in the South Okanagan, and indeed across the province, will depend on rigorous implementation, ongoing monitoring of market dynamics, and a willingness to adapt regulations based on observed impacts on both the rental and tourism sectors.

Ongoing Monitoring and Adaptation

The regulatory environment for short-term rentals in the South Okanagan is dynamic and subject to ongoing review and provincial approval. As the RDOS moves towards finalizing its decisions and as other municipalities in the region continue to adapt their own bylaws in response to provincial mandates, continuous monitoring of the STR market will be essential. This ongoing assessment will allow for the identification of any unintended consequences and for necessary adjustments to be made to the regulations. The goal is to ensure that the implemented rules effectively serve the diverse needs of the community while also supporting a vibrant and sustainable tourism industry. The adaptive management approach will be key to navigating the complexities of STR regulation in the years to come.

Conclusion

The confusion experienced by residents in the South Okanagan has temporarily paused the RDOS board’s decision-making process for proposed short-term rental changes. This situation underscores the inherent complexities in regulating STRs and highlights the critical importance of clear, accessible communication and robust community engagement. As the regulatory process continues, with a reconvened public hearing and the forthcoming release of additional clarifying information from RDOS staff, the region is working towards implementing regulations that aim to achieve a delicate balance between addressing housing needs and supporting economic interests. These efforts are being undertaken within the framework of evolving provincial legislation, which continues to shape the landscape of short-term rentals across British Columbia.